Unintended consequences? Or...intended?

"Deepen, exacerbate existing contradictions [i.e., problems], and if they don't exist, create them or convincingly claim that they exist, and then deepen, exacerbate them...and, in the resulting chaos, blame our enemies."   Vladimir Ilich Ulianov (aka Lenin)

Who is being blamed for the mess, which the leftist environmentalists started? The good old USA...of course!

And who is blaming the USA? The Left...of course! See it for yourself in David's report.

First of all, it must be understood that BHO and his acolytes can wreck America irreversibly, to the degree that pointing fingers in the aftermath would mean nothing. 

Second, they count on a lot of mass-manipulation power to place the blame on Republicans and conservatives after they have undone America. They learned it well from Lenin, know how to do it, and count with the means to do it. 

The Democrats and the rest of the Left, count on their side on thousands of stooges, proxies and useful-idiots (liberals) ingrained in the "mainstream" media, academia, the intelligentsia, entertainment, organized labor, and a plethora of Trojan horses such as, for example, move.org, NOW, NEA, ANSWER, Planned Parenthood, environmentalism, the gay lobby, and on and on.

They possess the power of mass-communication manipulation. That's how, to win the last US congressional elections, they invented clichés that they stuck on Republicans and then bamboozled the masses into believing them true. They were very successful with "The culture of corruption", "Bush lied with the WMD to lead us to the war in Iraq", "The war in Iraq is illegal", "Blood for oil", "America tortures", "the war is lost", and on and on.

It will be extremely easy for them to blame Republicans and conservatives for the wreck that BHO and his retinue would cause on America, and dupe the populace into believing it is true.

But even if they don’t succeed in their blame game, America is more important than the reputation of conservatives or Republicans. America, and the rest of the world, cannot afford BHO as President of the United States of America. Good Americans cannot allow BHO reach the White House; he must be defeated at the ballot box in November.

Losing to BHO just to blame the Democrats and the Left for the wreck they will cause is more than stupid, it's criminal.

What we must do is focus in sending to the US Congress as many conservatives as possible to protect America from whoever wins the Presidency next November. Find those good conservatives at http://www.GreatAmericanJournal.com/politics/ccdb2008/, and help them with all you got.

In parallel, within the bounds of civility, do as much as you can to attack and expose BHO and his campaigners (including his wife, who is campaigning heavily for him) on all veracious issues, be policy, character, skeletons, relations, statements, etc. America is too important to treat with silken gloves someone who wants to wreck America. The goal is to bloody politically BHO’s as much as possible, and in the process, make his coat-tails short and radioactive.

Finally -- while holding your nose, not to smell the stench, and while breathing deep, to assuage the nausea -- vote for McCain . . . and no more. Let the RNC, RINOs and the flaccid Republicans who created his candidacy do the fight for him.

 Although a hero on his own right, this isn’t about an epic John McCain making a list to save some among thousands of innocents doomed to inevitable death. This actually is about John McCain dealing with a peculiar kind of a list to avert his own inescapable death---his political death at the ballot box, that is---in the hands of the Democrats next November. This is, as well, about the undeniable fact that John McCain is walking into the presidential race proper with a splintered Republican Party that, furthermore, lacks the fire in the belly that only conservatives can ignite and sustain.

McCain can easily rally conservatives behind him. I am referring to across-the-board conservatives who, as I do, clearly understand the inextricable inter-relation among the social, fiscal and national security facets of conservatism, to the point of considering conservatism as one and only one.

All what he has to do is, one way or the other, work on his list; that is, clean up his long “rap sheet”, which, for the benefit of all, including McCain himself, follows next.

He, John Sidney McCain III, the senior United States Senator from Arizona and practically the Republican Party nominee for President of the United States of America:

1.   Paired with Ted Chappaquennedy to introduce the illegal-aliens amnesty bill.

2.   Joined John Edwards and again with Ted Chappaquennedy in the trial lawyer’s-dream Patients' Bill of Rights (By the way, Edwards made his fortune as a tort-trial lawyer.)

3.   Paired with Russ Feingold Drastically to introduce that infamous free-speech trumping bill.

4.   Paired with Joe Lieberman to introduce crackpot “climate-change” legislation inspired by Al Gore’s manmade global warming hoax.

5.   Is on the bandwagon of “climate-change”, actually a codeword for Al Gore’s manmade global warming hoax, and a smartass way of getting away with the hoax upon any climate change, which is something that continually has happened, is happening and will ever happen on earth.

6.   Opposed Bush’s two tax cuts, and worse, using leftist class warfare arguments.

7.   Supports social security credit for illegal aliens.

8.   Advocates full criminal trials for terrorists.

9.   Wants to close Guantanamo and ship the terrorist guests to mainland prisons.

10.   Opposes harsh interrogation techniques, such as dropping water (“waterboarding”) on the face of manacled Islamofascist terrorists that wouldn’t hesitate to behead any of us with their own daggers, or mass murder children, women and men for the only “sin” of being Americans.

11.   Joined the Democrats and the rest of the left and Islamofascists, along with other America’s enemies, venomously excoriating America for the pubertal hazing at Abu Ghraib by a bunch of idiotic prison guards.

12.   Supports stem-cell research on human embryos, which abortionists use as an “altruistic” justification for the murder of babies in gestation via abortion on demand.

13.   Opposes a marriage amendment to the Constitution.

14.   Opposes drilling in ANWR.

15.   Wanted to be John Kerry’s VP.

16.   Disparaged the factual ads of the Swift Boat Veterans for Truth as "dishonest and dishonorable".

17.   Voted against strictly constructionist judges.

18.   Vocally manifests dislike of justices of the like of Alito.

19.   Is a prominent member of the infamous Gang of 14.

20.  Was involved in the Keating-5 ethics scandal.

21.  Has chosen as his adviser on immigration (i.e., blanket amnesty for illegals) none else than lawyer Juan Hernández, an unabashedly vocal and hyperactive advocate of illegal immigration, with blanket amnesty, open borders and all.

He did all that, not we, conservatives; it is, then, him who must undo it, not us. But all he does is throw to us some meager crumbs that, he thinks, will placate us.

All what he has pledged is:

1. On taxes: support to keep Bush’s tax cuts, and not to raise more taxes. But what kind of “support” he means, active or just lukewarm, feigned? Anyway a more Democrat loaded congress---after next November--- would for sure override his veto on both issues.

2. On illegal immigration: secure the borders first. But he doesn’t explain what he means with “secure the borders”. He probably will come out with a ruse like Bush’s, who sent the National Guard “to the border” . . . to do janitorial, clerical, auto-mechanics and other menial work for the Border Patrol, which, furthermore, kept with its hands tied tight by the most absurd “rules of engagement.” Then, with the borders “secured” his way, he most likely, will then give blanket amnesty to the illegals. What other purpose serves Juan Hernández as his “immigration” adviser?

3. On tough interrogation of mass-murder bent Islamofascist terrorists: support for the Army Manual. But that is an ethereal, Delphian position in itself, and which doesn’t address the medullar issue: waterboarding and else.
   
   
4. On the judiciary: nominate constructionist judges. He most likely will leave it to his "friends across the aisle" to do the dirty job, to kill his nominations, that is. McCain is difficult to be trusted.

However, and worse, in the latest---and the last, for I hit the “unsubscribe” tab--- email I received today, March 11, 2008, from JohnMcCain@GOP.com McCain shrunk his pledge to mere routine generalities and misconceptions about the global war on Islamofascism:

“My commitment will be to cut taxes, reduce the size of government and bring the war [(?) The Iraq War ended the day Baghdad Fell, April 9, 2003; what’s been going thereafter has been a flawed occupation/stabilization effort that turned in the right direction only after the launch of the “surge”] to the swiftest possible conclusion without leaving the region [(?) The war on Islamofascism is global, including Iran, Syria (Baathism), Saudi Arabia (Wahhabism), Egypt (The Muslim Brotherhood) and here in the U.S.A.] in chaos, or an enemy emboldened to attack us elsewhere with weapons we dare not allow them to possess.”

McCain says that, now that he secured the nomination, his next step is “uniting” the Republican Party, which in his mind means enrolling to his side talk radio pundits such as Sean Hannity, Michael Reagan and others of that species, and have them golden the pill he wants us to swallow: that we not only can, but should trust him.

By the way, Hannity has arranged for a “mano-a-mano” charade interview with McCain one of these days, of which, I bet my arm, the result will surely be that Hannity gets puny “satisfactions” from McCain, and voila, by spontaneity, Hannity becomes a McCainista.

Everybody knows Hannity’s number.

Remember that Hannity was an active and enthusiastic supporter of abortionist, gun grabber, panderer to the homosexual lobby, and friend of illegal immigration, and scandal-closet owner Rudolph Giuliani. As soon as Giuliani scampered the race, Hannity then went vociferating for days against McCain, as if attempting to make us forget about his past active support for Giuliani.

No! Parrots trying to jawbone us into supporting John McCain won’t do; McCain has to clean his entire rap-sheet to get us on his side. How he has to do it . . . is his job to figure out; it is him who caused the whole mess, he has to undo it. If he thinks that conservatives are lemming or that he can pied-piper us into lockstep marching behind him, he better prepare for a rude awakening.

“Did you know that for the first year of every Deputy Sheriff's career in California, he/she is required to work that year in a jail.

Why?

It is so that they will know about sociopaths, who can lie to you while looking you in the eye. It is so that they will learn that people can commit horrible crimes, and then rapidly construct totally believable stories exonerating them.”

That’s what wrote to me a few days ago Dave Hollenbeck, an insightful retired California Highway Patrol officer, in a simile regarding Barack Hussein Obama’s “charm” and “eloquence”, as related to Obama’s articulate lying, rapidly diminishing credibility, and ulterior motives. That’s, by the way, an apprehension that should be extended to Hillary Diane Rodham-Clinton, a charmless and ineloquent sheer liar, as the Bosnia whopper confirmed it once more. Incidentally, she is the very one liar who publicly, on nationwide TV, called General David Howell Petraeus a prevaricator last year, with her “willing suspension of disbelief” outrageous and unwarranted vituperation.

But Hillary Diane Rodham-Clinton’s amoral persona has been well known for decades, and if her true nature is being magnified recently by the “mainstream” media, it is only because the apple of their eyes is now Barack Hussein Obama. Hadn’t it been for that, Hillary’s outright lie about her “epic” landing in Bosnia would have been hushed up, or a least dismissed as insignificant, by the “mainstream” media, which, incidentally, in no way reflect the mindset of mainstream America

Hillary Diane Rodham-Clinton is well known; the mystery here really is (or was?) Barack Hussein Obama.

Who’s this man---who just five years ago was a perfect unknown, and who now, with the majority support of the Democrat Party and the rest of the Left, which for all practical purposes are now one and the same---wants us to hire him for the delicate and critical post of President of the United States of America.

“With the dire winds now blowing, penuries will rain soon,” the old adage says; with the dicey prospect of Barack Hussein Obama becoming President of the United States of America, deep trouble for America---and for the rest of the world, for that matter---can be augured.

Oh, yeah, there were Jimmy Earl Carter and Bill Jefferson Clinton in the past, who left their particular brands of stigmas on the White House as, among other unsavory maculae, presidents enormously dangerous to the most fundamental aspects of America’s national security.

“America survived them,” some argue. “Why not, then, try Barack Hussein Obama,” naïves ask. “It would be beneficial for the sake of diversity,” the ones foolishly argue. “It’s past due,” the others contend . . . thoroughly soaked in white racial guilt, a mass-manifestation of morbidity among whites, invectively exacerbated by the purveyors and traders of Black victimosis. Does Barack Hussein Obama “typical white” aspersion ring a bell?

To hell with it! The notion of a Barack Hussein Obama presidency is crassly idiotic and highly perilous.

First, horrible electoral mistakes of the past don’t justify one more in the present. Second, and much graver: An Obama presidency would be completely suicidal in this historic juncture defining America’s fate, when America finds defending herself from the all-out war that Islamofascism has been waging on her since November 4, 1979. Fatidic a date that was; it was then when, during the calamitous Carter administration, Shiite Islamofascists assaulted the American embassy in Teheran, and then abducted and imprisoned the embassy staff for 444 days, all with, typical Democrat, full impunity. Impunity said I? It’s worse; with great rewards it is, for one of the abducting Islamofascist terrorists was none else than Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, the current virulent Islamofascist and rabid America-hater president of Islamofascist Iran.

It has been 28 long years that America has been suffering the vicious onslaught Islamofascism has been inflicting on her, thanks to James Earl Carter, the engender of the whole thing, and thanks to William Jefferson Clinton, the impassive brooder al-Qaida. (Five major al-Qaida attacks on America occurred with impunity during the eight year long Clinton presidency.)

And, now that we are mired in the midst of the nightmare that those two yoked us with, the Democrats and the rest of the Left, along with hordes of entranced naives and irrational racial-atoners, want Barack Hussein Obama to prolong the torture even further.

Hence the un-deferrable urgency of deciphering who Barack Husssein Obama is, particularly when the “mainstream” media’s “investigative journalists”, so good at digging real or fabricated dirt of conservatives and Republicans, keep an impenetrable shroud, an armor, an Iron Curtain around him.

This is a man, the essence of whose inimical hierology---some plausible argue---seems to be encapsulated in the Koran and Das Kapital. Well, toss the Bible into the brew as well, but with the Marxist take from his mentor and spiritual advisor of 20 years, Jeremiah Wright, who very comfortably and nonchalantly corrupts the Scriptures with fascist, hatred-sodden “Black Liberation Theology”.

Barack Hussein Obama’s association---during his criterion-formative adolescence years---with communist activist Frank Marshall Davis and others commies is getting increasingly documented (e.g., http://www.aim.org/aim-column/obamas-communist-mentor/).

His long and close association, as an adult, with America-hater and racist-bigot Jeremiah Wright has been exposed quite amply, and the exposure must be kept alive in the mind of voters henceforth, all the way up to November.

And now, Barack Hussein Obama's childhood connections with the Muslim world (in Indonesia), and his relatively recent connections with the Islamofascist world (in Kenya) are being uncovered as well, (e.g., http://web.israelinsider.com/Articles/Politics/12745.htm).

Of paramount importance is, then, to explore his connections in Kenya, the homeland of his ancestry on his father's side.

His first cousin Raila Odinga, for whom Barak Hussein Obama stomped when already a U.S. Senator, has a good chance of becoming Kenya's president (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Raila_Odinga). It sounds great, but there is a significant problem: Odinga has vowed to convert Kenya into an Islamic (Wahhabist) Republic, with Sharia law and all; that is, Kenya would become another manifestation of Saudi Arabia’s Wahhabism, the most insidious source of world Islamofascism.

Whatever philosophy he adheres to---a Jihadist Koran’s, or a sugared Das Kapital’s, or Jeremiah Wright’s Bible . . . or any witches' brew of the three---Barack Hussein Obama poses a grave threat to America. He needs to be scrutinized minutely and exposed broadly.

Investigative-reporting Bloggers and freelancers of the word, go for it!

About that Ignominious Speech . . . McCain’s

Rene Guerra

In his March 28, 2008 column, "McCain's Incoherent New World Order" (http://www.aim.org/aim-column/mccains-incoherent-new-world-order/), Accuracy in Media's Editor Cliff Kincaid tells it like it is, and, in the process, John Sidney McCain III unavoidably results demolishingly-exposed naked . . . as the liberaloid he in reality is.

John Sidney McCain III showed, for all to see, that he is about half as dangerous to America as Barack Hussein Obama and Hillary Diane Rodham-Clinton are.

In his speech (http://www.johnmccain.com/Informing/News/Speeches/872473dd-9ccb-4ab4-9d0d-ec54f0e7a497.htm) delivered a couple of days ago to the Los Angeles World Affairs Council, John Sidney McCain III explicitly acquiesces to surrendering America's sovereignty to others, by subjecting America to the sanction of other nations and international entities in matters that might involve genuine national interests. He then went all unhinged about Al Gore’s hoax, manmade “global warming,” about a mysterious “league of democracies,” about nuclear disarmament, and more. Kincaid addresses all that, and else, in detail.

GUANTARCTICA

John Sidney McCain III reiterates, next, his intention of closing Guantanamo, and--although he doesn’t say it--shipping all those Islamofascist terrorists confined at Guantanamo to prisons on the mainland . . . unless he plans to build a new prison for them in Antarctica, or “Guantarctica”, thereafter. Just imagine the mayhem those terrorists would cause in our already volatile prisons, and the converting of other inmates to terrorism. To compound it, he would make them subject to common criminal courts, where CAIR and the ACLU would have their August . . . at the expense of our laws and security, and at the expense of taxpayer money.

INHUMAN, TORTURER AMERICA

John Sidney McCain III, moreover, insidiously suggests that America treats inhumanely and tortures captured terrorists . . . Islamofascist terrorists that wouldn’t hesitate a fraction of a second to behead him, you or me, or to mass-murder thousands of defenseless, innocent children, women and men, for the “cardinal sin” of being Americans. He makes America inhumane and a torturer out of the pubertal hazing that some rogue idiots clowned with at Abu Ghraib on some captured terrorists. And he definitely refers, as well, to the--panic-triggering, but nothing more--very effective quid pro quo practice of spilling water on the face of manacled terrorists . . . to make them spill the beans. That’s all; I spill water on your face, and, in fair and square return, you spill out your diabolic plans. Voila!

ISLAMOFASCISM’S BLOODIED OLE PUNCHING BAG

Forgiving the anaphora, if after the 1979 Iranian abduction of the Embassy staff in Teheran, if after the 1983 Hezbollah murdering of 241 American servicemen in the bombing of the barracks in Beirut, if after the 1985 Palestine terrorists’ hijacking of the Achille Lauro, if after the 1993 al-Qaida bombing of the Twin Towers, if after the 1993 slaying of the Delta Force Rangers in Mogadishu, if after the 1998 al-Qaida bombing of the embassies in Tanzania and Kenya, if after the 1998 al-Qaida bombing of the Khobar Towers in Saudi Arabia, if after the 2000 al-Qaida bombing of the Cole, if after the almost 3,000 innocent and defenseless souls that al-Qaida mass murdered on 9/11, if after more of than 4,000 of our bravest slain in Iraq and Afghanistan, if after all that John Sidney McCain III hasn’t grasped whom we are dealing with and doesn’t stop stupidly cringing at treating Islamofascist terrorists as such, then he is a threat to America, as much as Barack Hussein Obama and Hillary Diane Rodham-Clinton are. (Notice the 5 Islamofascist attacks left with impunity during the William Jefferson Clinton’s presidency.)

But maybe John Sidney McCain III could change his mind if he sees Geert Wilders' film about the Quran and Islamofascism (http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=3369102968312745410); that if CAIR and the ACLU--that is, Islamofascism and the Left in symbiotic alliance--don’t force its removal from the Web.

In the interim, John Sidney McCain III--echoing again the Democrats and the rest of the Left—keeps portraying, practically, Abu Ghraib, Guantanamo, and waterboarding as tokens of America’s “plentiful inventory of atrocities”, as the Jeremiah Wrights of the world would most likely put it.

IMPERIALIST AMERICA

John Sidney McCain III, furthermore, practically echoing the venomous anti-American diatribes of the Democrats and the rest of the Left, insinuates in his speech that America is "imperialistic".

How could he!

America is the first superpower in recorded history, ever, that, in the process of legitimately defending herself, liberates peoples, and, in the aftermath, empowers them with the beautiful opportunity of embracing blessed effective democracy (free elections ensued by participatory-democratic form of government) and practicing plentifully fructiferous and rewarding free entrepreneurialism.

Is John Sidney McCain III such an ingrate to ignore that America--despite her past and present flaws--is the antithesis of the odious superpowers and minnow-powers of the past that went around busting other, in many cases weaker, nations?

Doesn’t he know that America saved the world in WWI, WWII, the Cold War, and now is freeing it from Islamofascism? Doesn’t he know that America freed South Korea from the North? Doesn’t he know that America contained Soviet expansionism in South East Asia? And doesn’t he know that America frees small nations as well? She freed Cuba and the Philippines from Spanish colonialism. She freed Grenada from Leninist-Stalinist thugs. She freed Panama from narco-dictator Manuel Noriega. She helped Nicaragua free itself from the Leninist-Sandinistas. She helped El Salvador fend off an armed Marxist-Leninist take-over. Listen, John Sidney McCain III, America is an equal-opportunity liberator, not an imperialistic power as you imply in your speech.

Is he, essentially, so ignorant, or is it that, “reaching across the aisle to his Democrat friends,” he just joins those whose ideology makes them conveniently ignore the conquest by arms--accompanied in most instances by pillaging, plundering, enslaving, bloodletting or other horrors--the super and minor powers of the past inflicted on others?

Doesn’t he realize that America is the most generous superpower ever, giving away billions of dollars to feed and provide education, agriculture, farming, housing, infrastructural and health assistance to dozens of poor countries across the planet?

John Sidney McCain III should know better. He should know the horrors other nations suffered in the hands of the ancient Egyptians, Assyrians, Babylonians, Medes, Persians, Macedonians, Romans, Arab Mohammedans, Vandals, Huns, Mongols, Spanish, British, French, Dutch, Belgians, Portuguese, Italians, Ottomans, Germans, Japanese, Bolsheviks, Saddam Hussein Iraqis, etc.

Those were indeed imperialistic and colonialists. And if odious European imperialism and colonialism came to an end, it was in great part due to the emergence of America after WWII as the overall most powerful nation that history has ever seen--“. . . the land of the free and the home of the brave . . .” as one Francis Scott Key saw it one memorable dawn, about 193 years ago.

But not to Jeremiah Wright--Barack Hussein Obama’s enlightening mentor, illuminating spiritual guide and, most likely, “Black Liberation Theology” sublime source of plenty dominical rapturous satoris and nirvanas--who venomously asperses America as “imperialistic”, “inhumane”, “torturer”, and worse. The only difference between him and John Sidney McCain III being that Wright says it openly, while the “straight-talk maverick”, obliquely.

Hillary Diane Rodham-Clinton grew into adulthood in similar beliefs, inspired by her mentors, socialist Saul Alinsky and Leninist-Stalinist Robert Treuhaft. Normal would then be of her to malign America, as she routinely does from her senatorial seat when referring to the same issues.

Would one, however, expect something resembling that from someone who calls himself a Republican and a conservative? Would one expect it from John Sidney MaCain III? No, but thither it is, his speech, for all to see.

THE AMNESTY EXPRESS

Does his speech signal the way he is “reaching out” to conservatives? Is how John Sidney McCain III is “reaching out” to the true soul of the nation?

Is it that why he keeps Juan Hernandez--an avowed and publicly hyperactive and vocal advocate of illegal immigration--as his “Hispanic Outreach Advisor”? And is the latter the answer to those who, wishfully thinking, took for a categorical assertion his elliptical declaration “I heard the people asking to secure the borders first”, and who wondered what he would do next, knowing deep down that the answer is sheer blanket amnesty?

A TALE OF TWO LIARS

Barack Hussein Obama may have been caught lying through his teeth that he never heard his mentor and spiritual guide spew any anti-American and racist venom in the twenty years of their close relationship. And Hillary Diane Rodham-Clinton may have been caught lying through her teeth, as well, that she landed under sniper fire in Bosnia, and had to run frantically dodging bullets and ducking for cover. (Bent as the Democrats are on hyphenating America--i.e., Balkanizing America--with everything they can, even with a bizarre “gay-American”, we may see soon one of the two claiming first to be “a liar-American”.)

And at the same time the two, Barack Hussein Obama and Hillary Diane Rodham-Clinton, may keep bloodying each other in their Jerry Springfield Show, knife and brass-knuckle melee for the Democrat nomination.

That’s it, those two may have mauled each other so viciously, and their credibility may have fallen to the floor, that they may have grown enormously weak, too prematurely, in the campaign.

Conversely, John Sidney McCain III, the Republican nomination in his pockets, may have taken his tour abroad, rubbing elbows with bigwigs here and there . . . reminiscing Rudolph William Louis "Rudy" Giuliani’s grand tour last year . . .  that resulted in nothing.

Furthermore, John Sidney McCain III may have launched already his presidential campaign with that very powerful political ad, with a real life scene where he is shown as a badly injured, heroic prisoner of the communists in Hanoi. Paradoxically, those were the very same times when Hillary Diane Rodham-Clinton and her serially adulterous consort, William Jefferson Clinton, were demonstrating in the streets for the very same communists in Hanoi, as “peace and anti-war demonstrators.”

McCain seems to have the upper hand, and look well positioned to trounce whomever results selected as the Democrat candidate.

THE CONSERVATIVE FACTOR

Not so fast!

If he doesn’t fire up the conservatives, John Sidney McCain III risks the fate of Gerald Rudolph Ford Jr., George Herbert Walker Bush (re-election) and Robert Joseph Dole, who were stately shunned by conservatives. And that prospect seems plausible, particularly when he doesn’t harbor any inspiring, let alone electrifying, agenda in his heart--as those three didn’t at the time--for all what he said in his speech sounded just like updated Thomas Woodrow Wilson’s folly. As those three must have thought at their time as GOP candidates, he seems to think that it is a straightforward matter of manifest destiny for him to be President . . . just to warm up with his liberaloid behind the big chair in the Oval Office.

“Straight-talk,” “maverick” (i.e., Gang of 14 member), and the true war hero he is, John Sidney McCain III remains, nevertheless, not only insipid, but, even worse, offensive as well, to conservatives. He “crossed the aisle” so many times that he practically ended up dangerously stuck across the aisle, in many issues of vital importance to America’s overall well-being. The old say runs: “The crock is taken so many times to the well, that one day ends up in pieces.” Too many “aisle crossings” he made, and John Sidney McCain III ended up looking quasi-Democrat or, in surgically precise politicking parlance, a RINO.

There shouldn’t be, then, even a pico-fraction of doubt in our mind, that conservatives’ last and only ditch at this juncture resides in sending to the U.S. Congress as many of their own as possible. That’s where conservatives should focus exclusively, while--on the fly, by carom--exposing Barack Hussein Obama and Hillary Diane Rodham-Clinton, and later, whoever wins the Democrat nomination.

Conservatives in the U.S. Congress could, to some degree, help rein in whoever wins the Presidency amongst those three serious threats to America, in alphabetical order, Hillary Diane Rodham-Clinton, John Sidney McCain III, and Barack Hussein Obama.

“Conservatives to the U.S. Capitol!” is the only battle-cry that John Sidney McCain III’s ignominious speech could inspire.